Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 32 Download : 8

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis eksistensi hukum adat sebagai sumber hukum dalam sistem hukum Indonesia melalui pendekatan historis dan kontemporer. Hipotesis yang dibangun adalah bahwa hukum adat, meskipun telah memperoleh pengakuan normatif dalam berbagai instrumen hukum nasional, belum sepenuhnya diimplementasikan secara substantif dalam praktik hukum negara.


Metode Penelitian: Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan historis, konseptual, dan perundang-undangan. Data diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan terhadap regulasi, putusan pengadilan, serta dokumen-dokumen akademik dan kebijakan yang relevan. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif-analitis untuk memetakan perkembangan hukum adat dan tantangan integrasinya dalam sistem hukum nasional.


Hasil dan Pembahasan: Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hukum adat memiliki dasar historis yang kuat dan relevansi kontemporer yang tinggi, tetapi masih menghadapi kendala struktural, politik, dan administratif dalam pengakuan dan pelaksanaannya. Temuan ini membuktikan bahwa fragmentasi kebijakan daerah, ketiadaan kodifikasi nasional, serta dominasi sistem hukum positivistik menjadi penghalang aktualisasi hukum adat.


Implikasi: Implikasi dari penelitian ini mengarah pada perlunya reformulasi kebijakan hukum nasional yang pluralistik dan inklusif terhadap sistem hukum lokal. Diperlukan kajian lanjutan yang bersifat empiris untuk menggali dinamika hukum adat di berbagai daerah secara lebih mendalam.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sumaya, P. S. (2025). Hukum Adat Sebagai Sumber Hukum Di Indonesia: Kajian Historis Dan Kontempoler. Journal of Law Review, 5(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.55098/jolr.v5i1.178
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aisy, S. R., Hakim, H. A., Krisnan, J., Hardyanthi, T., & Masithoh, M. Q. D. (2021). Customary criminal law in the Eastern of Indonesia: the special autonomy Province of Papua. Borobudur Law Review, 3(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.31603/burrev.5553
  2. Apriani, N., & Hanafiah, N. S. (2022). Telaah Eksistensi Hukum Adat pada Hukum Positif Indonesia dalam Perspektif Aliran Sociological Jurisprudence. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 3(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i3.226
  3. Arman, Z., & Daria, D. (2022). Memulihkan Hukum Adat Sebagai Sumber Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Indonesia. TERAJU, 4(01), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.35961/teraju.v4i01.423
  4. BASO MADIONG et al. (2023). Dynamics of Tenure Conflict in Ammatoa Kajang Customary Forest Area, Bulukumba Regency. Russian Law Journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i3.1260
  5. Boedhihartono, A. (2017). Can Community Forests Be Compatible With Biodiversity Conservation in Indonesia? Land, 6(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/land6010021
  6. Citrawan, H. (2021). The “Life” in the Living Law: Law, Emotion and Landscape. Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues, 1(2), 124. https://doi.org/10.19184/csi.v1i2.25443
  7. Dewantara, J. A., Suhendar, I. F., Rosyid, R., & Atmaja, T. S. (2019). Pancasila as Ideology and Characteristics Civic Education in Indonesia. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i5.1617
  8. Dhiaulhaq, A., & McCarthy, J. F. (2020). Indigenous Rights and Agrarian Justice Framings in Forest Land Conflicts in Indonesia. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 21(1), 34–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2019.1670243
  9. Hidayat, H., Yogaswara, H., Herawati, T., Blazey, P., Wyatt, S., & Howitt, R. (2018). Forests, Law and Customary Rights in Indonesia: Implications of a Decision of the Indonesian Constitutional Court in 2012. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 59(3), 293–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12207
  10. Husni, A., Mandala, O. S., & Bimarasmana, M. (2022). Rights of Indigenous Peoples in The Politics of Agrarian Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Fundamental Justice, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v3i2.1964
  11. Ilyas, I., & Kusuma, A. (2023). A Sulapa Eppe’e Model Construction For The Legal Protection of The Life Environment in The Coastal Fishing Resource Exploitation at South Sulawesi Province. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 4(2), 472–487. https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v4i2.195
  12. Ilyas, Ichsan, N., Nasir, C., Hasmiati Attas, N., & Eka Saputra, T. (2022). Empowering Community Legal Awareness in The Utilization of Mining Natural Resources and Environmental Protection. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 2(2), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v2i2.141
  13. Judijanto, L., Utama, A. S., Sahib, A., Sumarna, M. I., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2024). Comparative Analysis of the Use of Customary Law in Land Dispute Resolution: Case Study Approach. Rechtsnormen Journal of Law, 2(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.55849/rjl.v2i2.796
  14. Masykhur, A. (2021). Blessing In Disguise Teori Receptie: Dampak Teori Receptie Pada Tradisi Penyalinan Dan Penulisan Ulang Manuskrip Hukum Adat Dan Undang-Undang Kerajaan Islam Nusantara. Istinbath, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v19i2.268
  15. Mohamad, R. Bin, & Rideng, I. W. (2021). The Legal Pluralism in Law Education in Indonesia. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 4(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.4.1.2635.1-5
  16. Muhdar, M. Z., Husen, L. O., & Zainuddin. (2023). The Constitutionality of Customary Courts Dispute Resolution in Indigenous Communities from Tana Toraja Regency. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2022) (pp. 810–819). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-93-0_94
  17. Neltje Saly, J., Ocarina Fae, M., Kinanti, L., & Gracia, G. (2024). Akselerasi Hukum Adat: Penerapan Prinsip Free, Prior, Informed Consent (FPIC) Bagi Masyarakat Adat. Yustitiabelen, 10(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v10i1.923
  18. Podkovenko, T., & Chorna, K. (2021). Socio-cultural principles of the concept of “living law” Eugene Ehrlich. Aktual’ni Problemi Pravoznavstva, 1(4), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.35774/app2021.04.018
  19. Putra, I., & Lubis, A. F. (2024). Decentralisation and Constitutional Law in Indonesia: Balancing Regional Autonomy and National Unity. West Science Law and Human Rights, 2(02), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v2i02.1169
  20. Rahayu, L. D. (2020). Kritik Entitas Homogen Masyarakat Adat pada Putusan MK Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012 Melalui Feminist Political Ecology. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 1(8), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v1i8.215
  21. Rahmad, N., & Hafis, W. (2021). Hukum Progresif Dan Relevansinya Pada Penalaran Hukum Di Indonesia. El-Ahli : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 1(2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.56874/el-ahli.v1i2.133
  22. Salam, S. (2023). Legal Protection of Indigenous Institutions in The Frame of The Rule of Law (Legal Protection Theory). Cepalo, 7(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v7no1.2898
  23. Sampean, Wahyuni, E. S., & Sjaf, S. (2019). The Paradox of Recognition Principles in Village Law in Ammatoa Kajang Indigenous Community. Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 7(3), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v7i3.28630
  24. Saputra, T. E. (2023). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan Dalam Perspektif Reforma Agraria. Vifada Assumption Journal of Law, 1(1), 01–04. https://doi.org/10.70184/hq00ns23
  25. Sari, A. E. E., Gassing, A. Q., & Misbahudin, M. (2022). Legal Pluralism of the Ammatoa (Ilalang Embaya) Indigenous Community in Marriage Aspects (Analysis Study of Maqasid Al-Shari’ah). Transformatif, 6(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.23971/tf.v6i2.3577
  26. Suhariyanto, B. (2018). Problema Penyerapan Adat oleh Pengadilan dan Pengaruhnya bagi Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.33227
  27. Tamanaha, B. Z. (2019). The Promise and Conundrums of Pluralist Jurisprudence. The Modern Law Review, 82(1), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12393
  28. Tandori, T., & Supriyanto, V. H. (2025). Kontradiksi Hak Komunal dan Hak Ulayat dalam Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia: Tinjauan Yurisprudensi dan Regulasi Indonesia. Tunas Agraria, 8(3), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v8i3.483
  29. Tohari, I., Rohmah, S., & As-Suvi, A. Q. (2023). Exploring Customary Law: Perspectives of Hazairin and Cornelis Van Vollenhoven and its Relevance to the Future of Islamic Law in Indonesia. Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Dan Penelitian Hukum Islam, 7(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.30659/jua.v7i1.32600
  30. Yahya, T., & Syam, F. (2018). Rethinking The Role of Indigenous Law Community in Managing Indigenous Forest in Jambi Province. Jambe Law Journal, 1(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.1.1.35-54
  31. Yuliartini, N. P. R., Putra, I. B. W., Atmaja, G. M. W., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2022). The Construction of National Legal Systems from Pancasila’s Perspective. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 7(2), 479. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v7i2p479-488